* Updated misleading error message in production environment when adding ref to a functional component
* Reverted changes to codes.json
* Updated error message
* Warn about spying on the console
* Added suppress warning flag for spyOn(console)
* Nits
* Removed spy-on-console guard
* Fixed a potential source of false-positives in toWarnDev() matcher
Also updated (most of) ReactIncrementalErrorLogging-test.internal to use the new matcher
* Removed unused third param to spyOn
* Improved clarity of inline comments
* Removed unused normalizeCodeLocInfo() method
* enables ctrl + enter for keypress event on browsers other than firefox
* makes comment more descriptive as to affected platforms
* reverting fiber results
* Reset changes to results.json
* Remove old test file
* Add tests in the right place
* Move build/packages/* to build/node_modules/*
This fixes Node resolution in that folder and lets us require() packages in it in Node shell for manual testing.
* Link fixtures to packages/node_modules
This updates the location and also uses link: instead of file: to avoid Yarn caching the folder contents.
* Bump deps to Jest 22
* Prevent jsdom from logging intentionally thrown errors
This relies on our existing special field that we use to mute errors.
Perhaps, it would be better to instead rely on preventDefault() directly.
I outlined a possible strategy here: https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/11098#issuecomment-355032539
* Update snapshots
* Mock out a method called by ReactART that now throws
* Calling .click() no longer works, dispatch event instead
* Fix incorrect SVG element creation in test
* Render SVG elements inside <svg> to avoid extra warnings
* Fix range input test to use numeric value
* Fix creating SVG element in test
* Replace brittle test that relied on jsdom behavior
The test passed in jsdom due to its implementation details.
The original intention was to test the mutation method, but it was removed a while ago.
Following @nhunzaker's suggestion, I moved the tests to ReactDOMInput and adjusted them to not rely on implementation details.
* Add a workaround for the expected extra client-side warning
This is a bit ugly but it's just two places. I think we can live with this.
* Only warn once for mismatches caused by bad attribute casing
We used to warn both about bad casing and about a mismatch.
The mismatch warning was a bit confusing. We didn't know we warned twice because jsdom didn't faithfully emulate SVG.
This changes the behavior to only leave the warning about bad casing if that's what caused the mismatch.
It also adjusts the test to have an expectation that matches the real world behavior.
* Add an expected warning per comment in the same test
* Migrated several additional tests to use new .toWarnDev() matcher
* Migrated ReactDOMComponent-test to use .toWarnDev() matcher
Note this test previous had some hacky logic to verify errors were reported against unique line numbers. Since the new matcher doesn't suppor this, I replaced this check with an equivalent (I think) comparison of unique DOM elements (eg div -> span)
* Updated several additional tests to use the new .toWarnDev() matcher
* Updated many more tests to use .toWarnDev()
* Updated several additional tests to use .toWarnDev() matcher
* Updated ReactElementValidator to distinguish between Array and Object in its warning. Also updated its test to use .toWarnDev() matcher.
* Updated a couple of additional tests
* Removed unused normalizeCodeLocInfo() methods
* Migrated several additional tests to use new .toWarnDev() matcher
* Migrated ReactDOMComponent-test to use .toWarnDev() matcher
Note this test previous had some hacky logic to verify errors were reported against unique line numbers. Since the new matcher doesn't suppor this, I replaced this check with an equivalent (I think) comparison of unique DOM elements (eg div -> span)
* Updated several additional tests to use the new .toWarnDev() matcher
* Updated many more tests to use .toWarnDev()
* Added toWarnInDev matcher and connected to 1 test
* Added .toLowPriorityWarnDev() matcher
* Reply Jest spy with custom spy. Unregister spy after toWarnDev() so unexpected console.error/warn calls will fail tests.
* console warn/error throws immediately in tests by default (if not spied on)
* Pass-thru console message before erroring to make it easier to identify
* More robustly handle unexpected warnings within try/catch
* Error message includes remaining expected warnings in addition to unexpected warning
I'm running out of ideas to keep these commit messages entertaining. Thankfully this should keep the CI green and we can forget any of it ever happened.
We added this to Flow in v0.25 (about 2 years ago), but never actually
deprecated the legacy `declare var exports` syntax. Hoping to do that
soon, so clearing up uses that I can find.
Test Plan: flow
The BeforeInputPlugin dispatches null elements in an array if
composition or beforeInput events are not extracted. This causes a
an extra array allocation, but more importantly creates null states in
later event dispatch methods that are annoying to account for.
This commit makes it so that BeforeInputPlugin never returns a null
element inside an array.
* Add basic snapshot tests to ReactART components (Circle, Rectangle, Wedge)
* More tests on Circle, Rectangle, Wedge
* linc warning fixes
* - remove tests to Wedge component internal function
* More test on Wedge component, update snapshots
* Call and Return components should use ReactElement
ReactChildFiber contains lots of branches that do the same thing for
different child types. We can unify them by having more child types be
ReactElements. This requires that the `type` and `key` fields are
sufficient to determine the identity of the child.
The main benefit is decreased file size, especially as we add more
component types, like context providers and consumers.
This updates Call and Return components to use ReactElement. Portals are
left alone for now because their identity includes the host instance.
* Move server render invariant for call and return types
* Sort ReactElement type checks by most likely
* Performance timeline should skip over call components
Don't think these were intentionally omitted from the blacklist of
component types.
I went ahead and updated getComponentName to include special types, even
though I don't think they're used anywhere right now.
* Remove surrounding brackets from internal display names
* use different eslint config for es6 and es5
* remove confusing eslint/baseConfig.js & add more eslint setting for es5, es6
* more clear way to run eslint on es5 & es6 file
* seperate ESNext, ES6, ES6 path, and use different lint config
* rename eslint config file & update eslint rules
* Undo yarn.lock changes
* Rename a file
* Remove unnecessary exceptions
* Refactor a little bit
* Refactor and tweak the logic
* Minor issues
* fix#11759. false positive warning in IE11 when using React.Fragment
* simplify createElementWithValidation type check
* fix mistake
* Add an explanation
* We shouldn't use `number` for anything else
* Clarify further
* Harden tests around init/addition/update/removal of aliased attributes
I noticed some patterns weren't being tested.
* Call setValueForProperty() for null and undefined
The branching before the call is unnecessary because setValueForProperty() already
has an internal branch that delegates to deleteValueForProperty() for null and
undefined through the shouldIgnoreValue() check.
The goal is to start unifying these methods because their separation doesn't
reflect the current behavior (e.g. for unknown properties) anymore, and obscures
what actually happens with different inputs.
* Inline deleteValueForProperty() into setValueForProperty()
Now we don't read propertyInfo twice in this case.
I also dropped a few early returns. I added them a while ago when we had
Stack-only tracking of DOM operations, and some operations were being
counted twice because of how this code is structured. This isn't a problem
anymore (both because we don't track operations, and because I've just
inlined this method call).
* Inline deleteValueForAttribute() into setValueForAttribute()
The special cases for null and undefined already exist in setValueForAttribute().
* Delete some dead code
* Make setValueForAttribute() a branch of setValueForProperty()
Their naming is pretty confusing by now. For example setValueForProperty()
calls setValueForAttribute() when shouldSetAttribute() is false (!). I want
to refactor (as in, inline and then maybe factor it out differently) the relation
between them. For now, I'm consolidating the callers to use setValueForProperty().
* Make it more obvious where we skip and when we reset attributes
The naming of these methods is still very vague and conflicting in some cases.
Will need further work.
* Rewrite setValueForProperty() with early exits
This makes the flow clearer in my opinion.
* Move shouldIgnoreValue() into DOMProperty
It was previously duplicated.
It's also suspiciously similar in purpose to shouldTreatAttributeValueAsNull()
so I want to see if there is a way to unify them.
* Use more specific methods for testing validity
* Unify shouldTreatAttributeValueAsNull() and shouldIgnoreValue()
* Remove shouldSetAttribute()
Its naming was confusing and it was used all over the place instead of more specific checks.
Now that we only have one call site, we might as well inline and get rid of it.
* Remove unnecessary condition
* Remove another unnecessary condition
* Add Flow coverage
* Oops
* Fix lint (ESLint complains about Flow suppression)
* Fix treatment of Symbol/Function values on boolean attributes
They weren't being properly skipped because of the early return.
I added tests for this case.
* Avoid getPropertyInfo() calls
I think this PR looks worse on benchmarks because we have to read propertyInfo in different places.
Originally I tried to get rid of propertyInfo, but looks like it's important for performance after all.
So now I'm going into the opposite direction, and precompute propertyInfo as early as possible, and then just pass it around.
This way we can avoid extra lookups but keep functions nice and modular.
* Pass propertyInfo as argument to getValueForProperty()
It always exists because this function is only called for known properties.
* Make it clearer this branch is boolean-specific
I wrote this and then got confused myself.
* Memoize whether propertyInfo accepts boolean value
Since we run these checks for all booleans, might as well remember it.
* Fix a crash when numeric property is given a Symbol
* Record attribute table
The changes reflect that SSR doesn't crash with symbols anymore (and just warns, consistently with the client).
* Refactor attribute initialization
Instead of using flags, explicitly group similar attributes/properties.
* Optimization: we know built-in attributes are never invalid
* Use strict comparison
* Rename methods for clarity
* Lint nit
* Minor tweaks
* Document all the different attribute types
* Deduplication of warn selected on option
- Wrote a failing test
- Deduplication when selected is set on option
* Ran yarn preitter
* Fixed PR request
- Moved dedupe test to above
- Moved && case to seperate if to seperate static and dynamic things
- Render'd component twice
* Actually check for deduplication
* Minor nits
