`span_suggestions` is to provide mutually exclusive suggestions. When it was introduced, we made its behavior be that if a single suggestion is given to it, we present the suggestion inline, otherwise in patch format. Changing this to make all of its uses be verbose, as that is closer in intent of output.
The local trim_ascii_start function in the markdown parser duplicates
<[u8]>::trim_ascii_start() from the standard library (stable since 1.80).
Remove the custom function and call the stdlib method directly.
No behaviour change.
Fixes https://github.com/rustfoundation/interop-initiative/issues/53
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#152901 (Introduce a `#[diagnostic::on_unknown]` attribute)
- rust-lang/rust#155078 (Reject dangling attributes in where clauses)
- rust-lang/rust#154449 (Invert dependency between `rustc_errors` and `rustc_abi`.)
- rust-lang/rust#154646 (Add suggestion to `.to_owned()` used on `Cow` when borrowing)
- rust-lang/rust#154993 (compiletest: pass -Zunstable-options for unpretty and no-codegen paths)
- rust-lang/rust#155097 (Make `rustc_attr_parsing::SharedContext::emit_lint` take a `MultiSpan` instead of a `Span`)
Invert dependency between `rustc_errors` and `rustc_abi`.
Currently, `rustc_errors` depends on `rustc_abi`, which depends on `rustc_error_messages`. This is a bit odd.
`rustc_errors` depends on `rustc_abi` for a single reason: `rustc_abi` defines a type `TargetDataLayoutErrors` and `rustc_errors` impls `Diagnostic` for that type.
We can get a more natural relationship by inverting the dependency, moving the `Diagnostic` trait upstream. Then `rustc_abi` defines `TargetDataLayoutErrors` and also impls `Diagnostic` for it. `rustc_errors` is already pretty far upstream in the crate graph, it doesn't hurt to push it a little further because errors are a very low-level concept.
r? @davidtwco
Currently, `rustc_errors` depends on `rustc_abi`, which depends on
`rustc_error_messages`. This is a bit odd.
`rustc_errors` depends on `rustc_abi` for a single reason: `rustc_abi`
defines a type `TargetDataLayoutErrors` and `rustc_errors` impls
`Diagnostic` for that type.
We can get a more natural relationship by inverting the dependency,
moving the `Diagnostic` trait upstream. Then `rustc_abi` defines
`TargetDataLayoutErrors` and also impls `Diagnostic` for it.
`rustc_errors` is already pretty far upstream in the crate graph, it
doesn't hurt to push it a little further because errors are a very
low-level concept.
Stash parse errors when pasing rtn that doesn't use `(..)`.
Emit single error on `Foo::bar(qux)` that looks like rtn in incorrect position and suggest `Foo::bar(..)`.
```
error: return type notation not allowed in this position yet
--> $DIR/let-binding-init-expr-as-ty.rs:18:10
|
LL | struct K(S::new(()));
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
help: furthermore, argument types not allowed with return type notation
|
LL - struct K(S::new(()));
LL + struct K(S::new(..));
|
```
On incorrect rtn in let binding type for an existing inherent associated function, suggest `:` -> `=` to turn the "type" into a call expression.
```
error: expected type, found associated function call
--> $DIR/let-binding-init-expr-as-ty.rs:29:12
|
LL | let x: S::new(());
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
help: use `=` if you meant to assign
|
LL - let x: S::new(());
LL + let x = S::new(());
|
```
interpret: go back to regular string interpolation for error messages
Using the translatable diagnostic infrastructure adds a whole lot of boilerplate which isn't actually useful for const-eval errors, so let's get rid of it. This effectively reverts https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111677. That PR effectively added 1000 lines and this PR only removes around 600 -- the difference is caused by (a) keeping some of the types around for validation, where we can use them to share error strings and to trigger the extra help for pointer byte shenanigans during CTFE, and (b) this not being a full revert of rust-lang/rust#111677; I am not touching diagnostics outside the interpreter such as all the const-checking code which also got converted to fluent in the same PR.
The last commit does something similar for `LayoutError`, which also helps deduplicate a bunch of error strings. I can make that into a separate PR if you prefer.
r? @oli-obk
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/113117
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116764
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112618
There is a bunch of complexity supporting the "cannot check whether the
hidden type of opaque type satisfies auto traits" error that shows up in
`tests/ui/impl-trait/auto-trait-leak.rs`. This is an obscure error that
shows up in a single test. If we are willing to downgrade that error
message to a cycle error, we can do the following.
- Simplify the `type_of_opaque` return value.
- Remove the `cycle_stash` query modifier.
- Remove the `CyclePlaceholder` type.
- Remove the `SelectionError::OpaqueTypeAutoTraitLeakageUnknown`
variant.
- Remove a `FromCycleError` impl.
- Remove `report_opaque_type_auto_trait_leakage`.
- Remove the `StashKey::Cycle` variant.
- Remove the `CycleErrorHandling::Stash` variant.
That's a lot! I think this is a worthwhile trade-off.
Move `Spanned`.
It's defined in `rustc_span::source_map` which doesn't make any sense because it has nothing to do with source maps. This commit moves it to the crate root, a more sensible spot for something this basic.
r? @JonathanBrouwer
It's defined in `rustc_span::source_map` which doesn't make any sense
because it has nothing to do with source maps. This commit moves it to
the crate root, a more sensible spot for something this basic.
Clean up the eager formatting API
For https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/151366#event-22181360642
Previously eager formatting worked by throwing the arguments into a diag, formatting, then removing the args again. This is ugly so instead we now just do the formatting completely separately.
This PR has nice commits, so I recommend reviewing commit by commit.
r? @GuillaumeGomez
