Stacked on #35556 and #35559.
Given that we don't automatically clean up all view transition
animations since #35337 and browsers are buggy, it's important that you
clean up any `Animation` started manually from the events. However,
there was no clean up function for when the View Transition is forced to
stop. This also makes it harder to clean up custom timers etc too.
This lets you return a clean up function from all the events on
`<ViewTransition>`.
When dealing with optimistic state, a common problem is not knowing the
id of the thing we're waiting on. Items in lists need keys (and single
items should often have keys too to reset their state). As a result you
have to generate fake keys. It's a pain to manage those and when the
real item comes in, you often end up rendering that with a different
`key` which resets the state of the component tree. That in turns works
against the grain of React and a lot of negatives fall out of it.
This adds a special `optimisticKey` symbol that can be used in place of
a `string` key.
```js
import {optimisticKey} from 'react';
...
const [optimisticItems, setOptimisticItems] = useOptimistic([]);
const children = savedItems.concat(
optimisticItems.map(item =>
<Item key={optimisticKey} item={item} />
)
);
return <div>{children}</div>;
```
The semantics of this `optimisticKey` is that the assumption is that the
newly saved item will be rendered in the same slot as the previous
optimistic items. State is transferred into whatever real key ends up in
the same slot.
This might lead to some incorrect transferring of state in some cases
where things don't end up lining up - but it's worth it for simplicity
in many cases since dealing with true matching of optimistic state is
often very complex for something that only lasts a blink of an eye.
If a new item matches a `key` elsewhere in the set, then that's favored
over reconciling against the old slot.
One quirk with the current algorithm is if the `savedItems` has items
removed, then the slots won't line up by index anymore and will be
skewed. We might be able to add something where the optimistic set is
always reconciled against the end. However, it's probably better to just
assume that the set will line up perfectly and otherwise it's just best
effort that can lead to weird artifacts.
An `optimisticKey` will match itself for updates to the same slot, but
it will not match any existing slot that is not an `optimisticKey`. So
it's not an `any`, which I originally called it, because it doesn't
match existing real keys against new optimistic keys. Only one
direction.
We already append `randomKey` to each handle name to prevent external
libraries from accessing and relying on these internals. But more
libraries recently have been getting around this by simply iterating
over the element properties and using a `startsWith` check.
This flag allows us to experiment with moving these handles to an
internal map.
This PR starts with the two most common internals, the props object and
the fiber. We can consider moving additional properties such as the
container root and others depending on perf results.
Follow up to #35022.
It's now replaced by the `defer` option.
Sounds like nobody is actually using this option, including Meta, so we
can just delete it.
We've long had the CPU suspense feature behind a flag under the terrible
API `unstable_expectedLoadTime={arbitraryNumber}`. We've known for a
long time we want it to just be `defer={true}` (or just `<Suspense
defer>` in the short hand syntax). So this adds the new name and warns
for the old name.
For only the new name, I also implemented SSR semantics in Fizz. It has
two effects here.
1) It renders the fallback before the content (similar to prerender)
allowing siblings to complete quicker.
2) It always outlines the result. When streaming this should really
happen naturally but if you defer a prerendered content it also implies
that it's expensive and should be outlined. It gives you a opt-in to
outlining similar to suspensey images and css but let you control it
manually.
I don't think we're ready to land this yet since we're using it to run
other experiments and our tests. I'm opening this PR to indicate intent
to disable and to ensure tests in other combinations still work. Such as
enableHalt without enablePostpone. I think we'll also need to rewrite
some tests that depend on enablePostpone to preserve some coverage.
The conclusion after this experiment is that try/catch around these are
too likely to block these signals and consider them error. Throwing
works for Hooks and `use()` because the lint rule can ensure that
they're not wrapped in try/catch. Throwing in arbitrary functions not
quite ecosystem compatible. It's also why there's `use()` and not just
throwing a Promise. This might also affect the Catch proposal.
The "prerender" for SSR that's supporting "Partial Prerendering" is
still there. This just disables the `React.postpone()` API for creating
the holes.
This PR adds a `unstable_reactFragments?: Set<FragmentInstance>`
property to DOM nodes that belong to a Fragment with a ref (top level
host components). This allows you to access a FragmentInstance from a
DOM node.
This is flagged behind `enableFragmentRefsInstanceHandles`.
The primary use case to unblock is reusing IntersectionObserver
instances. A fairly common practice is to cache and reuse
IntersectionObservers that share the same config, with a map of
node->callbacks to run for each entry in the IO callback. Currently this
is not possible with Fragment Ref `observeUsing` because the key in the
cache would have to be the `FragmentInstance` and you can't find it
without a handle from the node. This works now by accessing
`entry.target.fragments`.
This also opens up possibilities to use `FragmentInstance` operations in
other places, such as events. We can do
`event.target.unstable_reactFragments`, then access
`fragmentInstance.getClientRects` for example. In a future PR, we can
assign an event's `currentTarget` as the Fragment Ref for a more direct
handle when the event has been dispatched by the Fragment itself.
The first commit here implemented a handle only on observed elements.
This is awkward because there isn't a good way to document or expose
this temporary property. `element.fragments` is closer to what we would
expect from a DOM API if a standard was implemented here. And by
assigning it to all top-level nodes of a Fragment, it can be used beyond
the cached IntersectionObserver callback.
One tradeoff here is adding extra work during the creation of
FragmentInstances as well as keeping track of adding/removing nodes.
Previously we only track the Fiber on creation but here we add a
traversal which could apply to a large set of top-level host children.
The `element.unstable_reactFragments` Set can also be randomly ordered.
Stacked on #34906.
Infer name from stack if it's the generic "lazy" name. It might be
wrapped in an abstraction. E.g. `next/dynamic`.
Also use the function name as a description of a resolved function
value.
<img width="310" height="166" alt="Screenshot 2025-10-18 at 10 42 05 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c63170b9-2b19-4f30-be7a-6429bb3ef3d9"
/>
## Overview
This PR adds the `ref` prop to `<Fragment>` in `react@canary`.
This means this API is ready for final feedback and prepared for a
semver stable release.
## What this means
Shipping Fragment refs to canary means they have gone through extensive
testing in production, we are confident in the stability of the APIs,
and we are preparing to release it in a future semver stable version.
Libraries and frameworks following the [Canary
Workflow](https://react.dev/blog/2023/05/03/react-canaries) should begin
implementing and testing these features.
## Why we follow the Canary Workflow
To prepare for semver stable, libraries should test canary features like
Fragment refs with `react@canary` to confirm compatibility and prepare
for the next semver release in a myriad of environments and
configurations used throughout the React ecosystem. This provides
libraries with ample time to catch any issues we missed before slamming
them with problems in the wider semver release.
Since these features have already gone through extensive production
testing, and we are confident they are stable, frameworks following the
[Canary Workflow](https://react.dev/blog/2023/05/03/react-canaries) can
also begin adopting canary features like Fragment refs.
This adoption is similar to how different Browsers implement new
proposed browser features before they are added to the standard. If a
frameworks adopts a canary feature, they are committing to stability for
their users by ensuring any API changes before a semver stable release
are opaque and non-breaking to their users.
Apps not using a framework are also free to adopt canary features like
Fragment refs as long as they follow the [Canary
Workflow](https://react.dev/blog/2023/05/03/react-canaries), but we
generally recommend waiting for a semver stable release unless you have
the capacity to commit to following along with the canary changes and
debugging library compatibility issues.
Waiting for semver stable means you're able to benefit from libraries
testing and confirming support, and use semver as signal for which
version of a library you can use with support of the feature.
## Docs
Check out the ["React Labs: View Transitions, Activity, and
more"](https://react.dev/blog/2025/04/23/react-labs-view-transitions-activity-and-more#fragment-refs)
blog post, and [the new docs for Fragment
refs`](https://react.dev/reference/react/Fragment#fragmentinstance) for
more info.
## Overview
This PR ships the View Transition APIs to `react@canary`:
- [`<ViewTransition
/>`](https://react.dev/reference/react/ViewTransition)
-
[`addTransitionType`](https://react.dev/reference/react/addTransitionType)
This means these APIs are ready for final feedback and prepare for
semver stable release.
## What this means
Shipping `<ViewTransition />` and `addTransitionType` to canary means
they have gone through extensive testing in production, we are confident
in the stability of the APIs, and we are preparing to release it in a
future semver stable version.
Libraries and frameworks following the [Canary
Workflow](https://react.dev/blog/2023/05/03/react-canaries) should begin
implementing and testing these features.
## Why we follow the Canary Workflow
To prepare for semver stable, libraries should test canary features like
`<ViewTransition />` with `react@canary` to confirm compatibility and
prepare for the next semver release in a myriad of environments and
configurations used throughout the React ecosystem. This provides
libraries with ample time to catch any issues we missed before slamming
them with problems in the wider semver release.
Since these features have already gone through extensive production
testing, and we are confident they are stable, frameworks following the
[Canary Workflow](https://react.dev/blog/2023/05/03/react-canaries) can
also begin adopting canary features like `<ViewTransition />`.
This adoption is similar to how different Browsers implement new
proposed browser features before they are added to the standard. If a
frameworks adopts a canary feature, they are committing to stability for
their users by ensuring any API changes before a semver stable release
are opaque and non-breaking to their users.
Apps not using a framework are also free to adopt canary features like
`<ViewTransition>` as long as they follow the [Canary
Workflow](https://react.dev/blog/2023/05/03/react-canaries), but we
generally recommend waiting for a semver stable release unless you have
the capacity to commit to following along with the canary changes and
debugging library compatibility issues.
Waiting for semver stable means you're able to benefit from libraries
testing and confirming support, and use semver as signal for which
version of a library you can use with support of the feature.
## Docs
Check out the ["React Labs: View Transitions, Activity, and
more"](https://react.dev/blog/2025/04/23/react-labs-view-transitions-activity-and-more#view-transitions)
blog post, and [the new docs for `<ViewTransition
/>`](https://react.dev/reference/react/ViewTransition) and
[`addTransitionType`](https://react.dev/reference/react/addTransitionType)
for more info.
## Summary
Experimentation has completed for this at Meta and we've observed
positive impact on key React Native surfaces.
## How did you test this change?
yarn flow fabric
As titled. This adds dev-only debugging information to Fizz / Flight
that could be used for tracking Promise's stack traces in "suspended by"
section of DevTools.
When we report an error we typically log the owner stack of the thing
that caught the error. Similarly we restore the `console.createTask`
scope of the catching component when we call `reportError` or
`console.error`.
We also have a special case if something throws during reconciliation
which uses the Server Component task as far as we got before we threw.
https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/main/packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactChildFiber.js#L1952-L1960
Chrome has since fixed it (on our request) that the Error constructor
snapshots the Task at the time the constructor was created and logs that
in `reportError`. This is a good thing since it means we get a coherent
stack. Unfortunately, it means that the fake Errors that we create in
Flight Client gets a snapshot of the task where they were created so
when they're reported in the console they get the root Task instead of
the Task of the handler of the error.
Ideally we'd transfer the Task from the server and restore it. However,
since we don't instrument the Error object to snapshot the owner and we
can't read the native Task (if it's even enabled on the server) we don't
actually have a correct snapshot to transfer for a Server Component
Error. However, we can use the parent's task for where the error was
observed by Flight Server and then encode that as a pseudo owner of the
Error.
Then we use this owner as the Task which the Error is created within.
Now the client snapshots that Task which is reported by `reportError` so
now we have an async stack for Server Component errors again. (Note that
this owner may differ from the one observed by `captureOwnerStack` which
gets the nearest Server Component from where it was caught. We could
attach the owner to the Error object and use that owner when calling
`onCaughtError`/`onUncaughtError`).
Before:
<img width="911" height="57" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-10 at 10 57 54 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0446ef96-fad9-4e17-8a9a-d89c334233ec"
/>
After:
<img width="910" height="128" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-10 at 11 06 20 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b30e5892-cf40-4246-a588-0f309575439b"
/>
Similarly, there are Errors and warnings created by ChildFiber itself.
Those execute in the scope of the general render of the parent Fiber.
They used to get the scope of the nearest client component parent (e.g.
div in this case) but that's the parent of the Server Component. It
would be too expensive to run every level of reconciliation in its own
task optimistically, so this does it only when we know that we'll throw
or log an error that needs this context. Unfortunately this doesn't
cover user space errors (such as if an iterable errors).
Before:
<img width="903" height="298" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-10 at 11 31 55 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cffc94da-8c14-4d6e-9a5b-bf0833b8b762"
/>
After:
<img width="1216" height="252" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-10 at 11 50
54 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f85f93cf-ab73-4046-af3d-dd93b73b3552"
/>
<img width="412" height="115" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-10 at 11 52 46 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a76cef7b-b162-4ecf-9b0a-68bf34afc239"
/>
This adds `experimental_scrollIntoView(alignToTop)`. It doesn't yet
support `scrollIntoView(options)`.
Cases:
- No host children: Without host children, we represent the virtual
space of the Fragment by attempting to scroll to the nearest edge by
using its siblings. If the preferred sibling is not found, we'll try the
other side, and then the parent.
- 1 or more host children: In order to handle the case of children
spread between multiple scroll containers, we scroll to each child in
reverse order based on the `alignToTop` flag.
Due to the complexity of multiple scroll containers and dealing with
portals, I've added this under a separate feature flag with an
experimental prefix. We may stabilize it along with the other APIs, but
this allows us to not block the whole feature on it.
This PR was previously implementing a much more complex approach to
handling multiple scroll containers and portals. We're going to start
with the simple loop and see if we can find any concrete use cases where
that doesn't suffice. 01f31d43013ba7f6f54fd8a36990bbafc3c3cc68 is the
diff between approaches here.
After an easy couple version with #34252, this version is less flexible
(and safer) on inferring exported types mainly.
We require to annotate some exported types to differentiate between
`boolean` and literal `true` types, etc.
This is intended to be used by various client side resources where the
transfer size is interesting to know how it'll perform in various
network conditions. Not intended to be added by the server.
For now it's only added internally by DevTools itself on img/css but
I'll add it from Flight Client too in a follow up.
This now shows this as the "transfer size" which is the encoded body
size + headers/overhead. Where as the "fileSize" that I add to images is
the decoded body size, like what you'd see on disk. This is what Chrome
shows so it's less confusing if you compare Network tab and this view.
Stacked on https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/34069
Same basic semantics as the react-dom for determining document position
of a Fragment compared to a given node. It's simpler here because we
don't have to deal with inserted nodes or portals. So we can skip a
bunch of the validation logic.
The logic for handling empty fragments is the same so I've split out
`compareDocumentPositionForEmptyFragment` into a shared module. There
doesn't seem to be a great place to put shared DOM logic between Fabric
and DOM configs at the moment. There may be more of this coming as we
add more and more DOM APIs to RN.
For testing I've written Fantom tests internally which pass the basic
cases on this build. The renderer we have configured for Fabric tests in
the repo doesn't support the Element APIs we need like
`compareDocumentPosition`.
Same as #34166 but for Suspensey images.
The trick here is to check the `SuspenseyImagesMode` since not all
versions of React and not all subtrees will have Suspensey images
enabled yet.
The other trick is to read back from `currentSrc` to get the image url
we actually resolved to in this case. Similar to how for Suspensey CSS
we check if the media query would've matched.
<img width="591" height="205" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-11 at 9 32 56 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ac98785c-d3e0-407c-84e0-c27f86c0ecac"
/>
We need to track that Suspensey CSS (Host Resources) can contribute to
the loading state. We can pick up the start/end time from the
Performance Observer API since we know which resource was loaded.
If DOM nodes are not filtered there's a link to the `<link>` instance.
The `"awaited by"` stack is the callsite of the JSX creating the
`<link>`.
<img width="591" height="447" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-11 at 1 35 21 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/63af0ca9-de8d-4c74-a797-af0a009b5d73"
/>
Inspecting the link itself:
<img width="592" height="344" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-11 at 1 31 43 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/89603dbc-6721-4bbf-8b58-6010719b29e3"
/>
In this approach I only include it if the page currently matches the
media query. It might contribute in some other scenario but we're not
showing every possible state but every possible scenario that might
suspend if timing changes in the current state.
This creates a debug info object for the React.lazy call when it's
called on the client. We have some additional information we can track
for these since they're created by React earlier.
We can track the stack trace where `React.lazy` was called to associate
it back to something useful. We can track the start time when we
initialized it for the first time and the end time when it resolves. The
name from the promise if available.
This data is currently only picked up in child position and not
component position. The component position is in a follow up.
<img width="592" height="451" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-08 at 2 49 33 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/913d2629-6df5-40f6-b036-ae13631379b9"
/>
This begs for ignore listing in the front end since these stacks aren't
filtered on the server.
The name prop will be used in the Suspense tab to help identity a
boundary. Activity will also allow names. A custom component can be
identified by the name of the component but built-ins doesn't have that.
This PR adds it to the Components Tree View as well since otherwise you
only have the key to go on. Normally we don't add all the props to avoid
making this view too noisy but this is an exception along with key to
help identify a boundary quickly in the tree.
Unlike the SuspenseNode store, this wouldn't ever have a name inferred
by owner since that kind of context already exists in this view.
<img width="600" height="161" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-08 at 1 20 36 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fe50d624-887a-4b9d-9186-75f131f83195"
/>
I also made both the key and name prop searchable.
<img width="608" height="206" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-08 at 1 32 27 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d3502d9c-7614-45fc-b973-57f06dd9cddc"
/>
Stacked on #34016.
This is using the same thing we already do for the performance track to
provide a description of the I/O based on the content of the resolved
Promise. E.g. a Response's URL.
<img width="375" height="388" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-28 at 1 09 49 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f3fdc40f-4e21-4e83-b49e-21c7ec975137"
/>
There's a lot of overlap between `enableComponentPerformanceTrack` and
`enableAsyncDebugInfo` because they both rely on timing information. The
former is mainly emit timestamps for how long server components and
awaits took. The latter how long I/O took.
`enableAsyncDebugInfo` is currently primarily for the component
performance track but its meta data is useful for other debug tools too.
This promotes that flag to stable.
However, `enableComponentPerformanceTrack` needs more work due to
performance concerns with Chrome DevTools so I need to separate them.
This keeps doing most of the timing tracking on the server but doesn't
emit the per-server component time stamps when
`enableComponentPerformanceTrack` is false.
This resolves an outstanding issue where it was possible for debug info
and console logs to become out of order if they up blocked. E.g. by a
future reference or a client reference that hasn't loaded yet. Such as
if you console.log a client reference followed by one that doesn't. This
encodes the order similar to how the stream chunks work.
This also blocks the main chunk from resolving until the last debug info
has fully loaded, including future references and client references.
This also ensures that we could send some of that data in a different
stream, since then it can come out of order.
We use the stack of a Promise as the start of the I/O instead of the
actual I/O since that can symbolize the start of the operation even if
the actual I/O is batched, deduped or pooled. It can also group multiple
I/O operations into one.
We want the deepest possible Promise since otherwise it would just be
the Component's Promise.
However, we don't really need deeper than the boundary between first
party and third party. We can't just take the outer most that has third
party things on the stack though because third party can have callbacks
into first party and then we want the inner one. So we take the inner
most Promise that depends on I/O that has a first party stack on it.
The realization is that for the purposes of determining whether we have
a first party stack we need to ignore async stack frames. They can
appear on the stack when we resume third party code inside a resumption
frame of a first party stack.
<img width="832" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-08 at 6 34 25 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1636f980-be4c-4340-ad49-8d2b31953436"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Sebbie Silbermann <sebastian.silbermann@vercel.com>
Stacked on #33658 and #33659.
If we detect that a component is receiving only deeply equal objects,
then we highlight it as potentially problematic and worth looking into.
<img width="1055" alt="Screenshot 2025-06-27 at 4 15 28 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e96c6a05-7fff-4fd7-b59a-36ed79f8e609"
/>
It's fairly conservative and can bail out for a number of reasons:
- We only log it on the first parent that triggered this case since
other children could be indirect causes.
- If children has changed then we bail out since this component will
rerender anyway. This means that it won't warn for a lot of cases that
receive plain DOM children since the DOM children won't themselves get
logged.
- If the component's total render time including children is 100ms or
less then we skip warning because rerendering might not be a big deal.
- We don't warn if you have shallow equality but could memoize the JSX
element itself since we don't typically recommend that and React
Compiler doesn't do that. It only warns if you have nested objects too.
- If the depth of the objects is deeper than like the 3 levels that we
print diffs for then we wouldn't warn since we don't know if they were
equal (although we might still warn on a child).
- If the component had any updates scheduled on itself (e.g. setState)
then we don't warn since it would rerender anyway. This should really
consider Context updates too but we don't do that atm. Technically you
should still memoize the incoming props even if you also had unrelated
updates since it could apply to deeper bailouts.
